On Friday, cryptocurrency alternate Bybit was allegedly hacked by North Korea’s Lazarus group, which drained practically $1.4 billion in ether (ETH) from the alternate.

Following the hack, Arthur Hayes, BitMEX co-founder and claiming to be a significant ether (ETH) holder, wrote a publish on X to Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin on whether or not he’ll “advocate to roll again the chain to assist @Bybit_Official.” In the meantime, in an X areas session, Bybit’s CEO Ben Zhou revealed that his group had additionally reached out to the Ethereum Basis to see if it was one thing the community would take into account, noting that such a choice must be primarily based on what the community’s neighborhood needs.

Hayes’s publish instantly provoked a fierce response from the Ethereum neighborhood, which was agency in its perception that it would not occur. Some even questioned whether or not the BitMEX founder was joking. CoinDesk reached out to Hayes over X to make clear his feedback.

Ethereum members, just like the core developer groups, are vastly in opposition to “rolling again” the community as a result of it could override core parts of decentralization. If Buterin selected his personal that it could occur, then that may be seen as the tip of Ethereum’s ethos, which closely includes numerous developer groups and different neighborhood members on the subject of the well being and state of the blockchain.

“Rolling again the chain would give ETH no goal. What is the level in the event you can simply change guidelines,” stated person @the_weso in a publish on X.

Some exterior the Ethereum neighborhood pointed to the 2016 DAO hack for instance when $60 million in ETH was stolen. The community went ahead with a tough fork, splitting the outdated community into two, and the brand new chain continued on as Ethereum.

That onerous fork was not a “rollback,” although; it was referred to as an “irregular state transition.” Ethereum technically can’t “roll again” the community as a result of it depends on an account mannequin, the place accounts maintain customers’ ETH.

On the time of the hack, builders upgraded their nodes to a brand new consumer or software program. Those that didn’t improve their nodes have been nonetheless on the outdated chain, which grew to become referred to as Ethereum Traditional.

When the nodes upgraded to the brand new software program, the stolen ETH may transfer from one Ethereum account handle to the subsequent.

“The ‘irregular state change’ that they carried out on the time of the DAO onerous fork was this: they airlifted all of the ETH within the DAO good contracts out to a refund contract that may ship you 1 ETH for each 100 DAO tokens you despatched in,” wrote Laura Shin of Unchained in a publish on X.

Learn extra: Arthur Hayes Floats the Thought of Rolling Again Ethereum Community to Negate $1.4B Bybit Hack, Drawing Group Ire