Jamie Waddell and Danny Walker

Would increasing mortgage provide result in elevated residence possession? On condition that 90% of younger residence homeowners have a mortgage, it’s tempting to imagine the reply is sure. However our evaluation means that assumption will not be essentially true. We present that will increase in mortgage provide have traditionally had no discernible impact on the house possession charge and as an alternative are likely to push up on home costs, which makes it more durable for first-time patrons (FTBs) to afford their first residence. Additionally they are likely to divert lending in direction of home-movers and there’s some proof that they improve rents too.

Home costs have risen materially for the reason that 2000s however residence possession has flatlined

The common home worth within the UK has roughly doubled up to now 20 years. Even after the latest bout of excessive inflation, client costs have solely risen by three quarters since then, so homes are a couple of quarter dearer in actual phrases. In the meantime the residence possession charge in England has been flat for a lot of years, having fallen barely following the monetary disaster.

It’s tempting to suppose that rising mortgage provide would improve residence possession

Mortgages are nonetheless by far the most typical manner that younger folks get on the housing ladder. Half of all residence homeowners have a mortgage in England, however that share rises to 90% amongst these aged 16–34. So it’s tempting to suppose that rising mortgage provide will improve residence possession. Whereas the share of mortgages going to FTBs has risen lately, the discount in general mortgage market exercise means the variety of FTB mortgages within the UK has fallen.

The Authorities has lately requested monetary regulators to take motion to help residence possession – it’s a part of the secondary goal given to the Financial institution’s Monetary Coverage Committee (FPC). The Monetary Conduct Authority lately introduced a evaluation of its laws to help residence possession. One of many measures it’s adopting would loosen mortgage credit score provide by way of the principles governing how lenders assess affordability. The FPC individually withdrew its Affordability Take a look at Advice in 2022, noting that there is perhaps small advantages for youthful and lower-income debtors, who usually tend to be FTBs.

This begs the query: would rising mortgage provide improve residence possession within the UK? The reply isn’t clear reduce. Rising credit score provide doesn’t essentially improve the variety of FTBs, which might be one of many methods for it to extend residence possession. Earlier analysis taking a look at housing markets in Eire, the UK and the United States factors to why that is perhaps – greater mortgage provide pushes up home costs, which makes issues tougher for FTBs. On this publish we revisit the query.

Isolating the impact of mortgage credit score provide reasonably than demand

To estimate the potential impacts of insurance policies that improve mortgage provide, we have to determine provide shocks within the mortgage market. Doing so means we will strip out components that improve demand for mortgages which may bias our estimates.

Particularly we search for indicators of credit score provide which are unaffected by every part else within the economic system. We use just a few completely different measures, borrowing from different analysis:

1. Christie and Rajan (2025) isolate mortgage provide shocks on the lender degree by figuring out ‘granular’ shocks to massive particular person lenders in a concentrated market.
2. Banks et al (2024) derive an information set of adjustments in general credit score provide on the lender degree, which strips out adjustments in credit score demand.
3. Erten et al (2022) present that lenders who have been required to ringfence their retail banking operations in 2019 can borrow at decrease charges, which might improve the quantity of mortgage credit score they’ll provide.

These measures are all on the lender degree. We map every of them to Northern Eire, Scotland and Wales and the 9 areas of England utilizing the historic shares of lending by every lender in every nation or area, that are fairly persistent over time. This implies we successfully assume that shocks to a given lender could have a bigger affect in mortgage markets the place that lender has traditionally had a much bigger market share.

Will increase in mortgage lending push up on home costs

We run a native projections regression with instrumental variables. Which means estimating the impact of the credit score provide shocks described above on the worth of whole mortgage lending in every area or nation to isolate the impact of credit score provide, then estimating the impact of mortgage lending on the outcomes of curiosity: the extent of home costs and the house possession charge.

The time interval lined by our evaluation is 2005 to 2020. The controls within the regression embody time fastened results to seize UK-wide macroeconomic and demographic adjustments, which soak up the impact of financial coverage on home costs. We additionally embody a set of regional fastened results to seize persistent variations within the traits of areas. We weight the regressions by the variety of households in every area.

Chart 1 reveals the outcomes. We estimate {that a} 1% improve in mortgage credit score, because of credit score provide shocks, results in UK home costs rising by as much as 0.6%. This optimistic impact on home costs builds slowly, peaks after round one to 2 years after which may start to unwind.

Chart 1: Optimistic shocks to credit score provide are likely to push up on UK home costs

Notes: The chart reveals the estimated affect of credit score provide shocks on home costs. Based mostly on a neighborhood projection regression of the log of home costs on the log of credit score flows, with devices to determine credit score provide shocks, as described above. Controls embody time and area fastened results. Gray space is 95% confidence interval.

Sources: Financial institution of England, Workplace for Nationwide Statistics (ONS) and Product Gross sales Database (PSD).

How massive is a 1% improve in mortgage credit score? The common annual improve earlier than the pandemic was 5% with lots of quarterly volatility. So it isn’t tiny.

However will increase in mortgage lending don’t have any discernible affect on residence possession

Chart 2 presents comparable outcomes for residence possession, specializing in England reasonably than the UK given knowledge availability. We discover no discernible impact of adjustments in mortgage credit score provide on the share of home-owning households (outright or by way of a mortgage) in a area.

In one other specification we discover no impact of credit score provide on the share of mortgagors within the inventory of households. Trying on the circulate of mortgages, there’s some proof that credit score provide shocks are likely to push up on the share of residence movers and push down on the share of FTBs. So credit score is perhaps diverted away from FTBs, on the margin.

Chart 2: There is no such thing as a discernible affect of credit score provide shocks on residence possession in England

Notes: The chart reveals the estimated affect of credit score provide shocks on the share of households (degree) which are residence homeowners. Based mostly on a neighborhood projection regression of the house possession charge on the log of whole credit score flows, with devices to determine credit score provide shocks, as described above. Information on residence possession is for England. Controls embody time and area fastened results. Gray space is 95% confidence interval.

Sources: Financial institution of England, English Housing Survey and PSD.

In a separate evaluation utilizing the identical strategies, we discover some proof that mortgage credit score provide pushes up barely on non-public rents, however by lower than on home costs, so the home worth to hire ratio rises.

Why doesn’t mortgage lending improve residence possession?

To know why adjustments in mortgage provide have an effect on home costs, it’s useful to consider how they may have an effect on the demand and provide of housing for owner-occupiers on combination. A basic theme from the economics literature is that will increase in credit score provide make it simpler for potential patrons to get a mortgage, elevating housing demand.

The impact of this improve in demand is dependent upon how the availability of owner-occupier housing adjustments in response. At one excessive, if provide can’t improve in any respect to fulfill the additional demand, then home costs improve and there’s no impact on residence possession. However on the different excessive, if provide responds elastically to fulfill elevated demand, the house possession charge will increase and there’s no impact on home costs. Of the 2 extremes our outcomes counsel the UK housing market is far nearer to the primary state of affairs, the place provide doesn’t modify to fulfill demand.

Chart 3: The house possession charge tends to be greater in areas the place housing provide is extra elastic

Notes: This binned scatter chart teams Institute for Fiscal Research (IFS) estimates for regional housing provide elasticity for areas of England into 20 equal-sized buckets alongside the x-axis, and for every bucket plots the typical residence possession charge alongside the y-axis after controlling for time fastened results, home costs, regional GDP, inhabitants and whole mortgage credit score.

Sources: Financial institution of England, IFS, ONS and PSD.

In actuality the affect on residence possession may depend upon how focused the change in mortgage provide is. There’s proof that insurance policies that direct credit score particularly in direction of low-deposit mortgages – which FTBs are likely to take out – do improve residence possession. This is available in spite of a giant upwards impact on home costs. That is perhaps as a result of these insurance policies redirect mortgage provide reasonably than rising it on combination.

Provide of housing appears unresponsive to demand

Our outcomes counsel the availability of UK housing is unresponsive to demand however they don’t present a definitive reply for why that’s. New provide might come from newly constructed homes or from changing rental properties into properties that new residence homeowners wish to purchase. It may very well be that owner-occupier and rental markets are segmented, so rental properties are troublesome to transform. It may be that landlords’ perceptions of future money flows and the standard of the housing inventory have an effect on the responsiveness of provide. Different analysis means that the speed of home constructing is unresponsive to demand in England – so an absence of recent homes might be a part of the issue. Chart 3 confirms that in areas of England the place home constructing is extra elastic the house possession charge tends to be greater.

Summing up

Our outcomes counsel that coverage actions aiming to extend combination mortgage provide won’t essentially improve residence possession, except they’re accompanied by parallel efforts to extend the responsiveness of housing provide. We additionally make clear the dynamics of the UK housing market, that are related to financial and prudential policymakers given the significance of housing to financial transmission and monetary sector stability sheets.

Jamie Waddell works within the Financial institution’s Macro-Monetary Dangers Division and Danny Walker works within the Financial institution’s Financial Coverage Transformation Division.

If you wish to get in contact, please electronic mail us at bankunderground@bankofengland.co.uk or depart a remark under.

Feedback will solely seem as soon as authorised by a moderator, and are solely printed the place a full title is provided. Financial institution Underground is a weblog for Financial institution of England employees to share views that problem – or help – prevailing coverage orthodoxies. The views expressed listed below are these of the authors, and are usually not essentially these of the Financial institution of England, or its coverage committees.