I used to be on a household trip in August 2011 after I obtained an e mail from a journalist asking me what I assumed in regards to the S&P rankings downgrade for the US. Since I keep blissfully unaware of most information tales and issues associated to markets when I’m on the seaside, I needed to search for what he was speaking about, and it was S&P’s choice to downgrade america, which had at all times loved AAA, the very best sovereign score  that may be granted to a rustic, to AA+, reflecting their considerations about each the fiscal challenges confronted by the nation, with mounting commerce and finances deficits, in addition to the willingness of its political establishments to flirt with the potential of default. For greater than a decade, S&P remained the outlier, however in 2023, Fitch joined it by additionally downgrading the US from AAA to AA+, citing the identical causes. That left Moody’s, the third of the key sovereign rankings businesses, as the one one which endured with a Aaa (Moody’s equal of AAA) for the US, however that modified on Could 16, 2025, when it too downgraded the US from Aaa (damaging) to Aa1 (steady). For the reason that rankings downgrade occurred after shut of buying and selling on a Friday, there was concern that markets would get up on the next  Monday (Could 19) to a wave of promoting, and whereas that didn’t materialize, the remainder of the week was a down week for each shares and US treasury bonds, particularly on the longest finish of the maturity spectrum. Quite than rehash the arguments about US debt and political dysfunction, which I’m positive that you simply had learn elsewhere, I assumed I might take this second to speak about sovereign default danger, how rankings businesses price sovereigns, the biases and errors in sovereign rankings and their predictive energy, and use that dialogue as a launching pad to speak about how the US rankings downgrade will have an effect on fairness and bond valuations not simply within the US, however all over the world.

Sovereign Defaults: A Historical past

    By way of time, governments have typically been depending on debt to finance themselves, some within the native forex and far in a international forex. A big proportion of sovereign defaults have occurred with international forex sovereign borrowing, because the borrowing nation finds itself in need of the international forex to satisfy its obligations. Nonetheless, these defaults, and particularly so lately, have been supplemented by nations which have chosen to default on native forex borrowings. I exploit the phrase “chosen” as a result of most nations  have the capability to keep away from default on native forex debt, having the ability to print cash in that forex to repay debt, however selected not to take action, as a result of they feared the results of the inflation that might observe greater than the results of default.

Whereas the variety of sovereign defaults has ebbed and flowed over time, there are two factors value making in regards to the knowledge. The primary is that, over time, sovereign defaults, particularly on international forex debt, have shifted from financial institution debt to sovereign bonds, with thrice as many sovereign defaults on bonds than on financial institution loans in 2023. The second is that native forex defaults are persistent over time, and whereas much less frequent than international forex defaults, stay a big proportion of whole defaults.

    The implications of sovereign default have been each financial and political. Moreover the plain implication that lenders to that authorities lose some or an excessive amount of what’s owed to them, there are different penalties. Researchers who’ve examined the aftermath of default have come to the next conclusions in regards to the short-term and long-term results of defaulting on debt:

1. Default has a damaging affect on the financial system, with actual GDP dropping between 0.5% and a couple of%, however the bulk of the decline is within the first yr after the default and appears to be brief lived.
2. Default does have an effect on a rustic’s long-term sovereign score and borrowing prices. One research of credit score rankings in 1995 discovered that the rankings for nations that had defaulted no less than as soon as since 1970 have been one to 2 notches decrease than in any other case comparable nations that had not defaulted. In the identical vein, defaulting nations have borrowing prices which can be about 0.5 to 1% greater than nations that haven’t defaulted. Right here once more, although, the consequences of default dissipate over time.
3. Sovereign default could cause commerce retaliation. One research signifies a drop of 8% in bilateral commerce after default, with the consequences lasting for as much as 15 years, and one other one which makes use of business degree knowledge finds that export-oriented industries are significantly damage by sovereign default.
4. Sovereign default could make banking methods extra fragile. A research of 149 nations between 1975 and 2000 signifies that the likelihood of a banking disaster is 14% in nations which have defaulted, an eleven percentage-point improve over non-defaulting nations.
5. Sovereign default additionally will increase the probability of political change. Whereas not one of the research deal with defaults per se, there are a number of which have examined the after-effects of sharp devaluations, which frequently accompany default. A research of devaluations between 1971 and 2003 finds a forty five% improve within the likelihood of change within the high chief (prime minister or president) within the nation and a 64% improve within the likelihood of change within the finance government (minister of finance or head of central financial institution).

In abstract, default is expensive, and nations don’t (and shouldn’t) take the potential of default flippantly. Default is especially costly when it results in banking crises and forex devaluations; the previous has a longstanding affect on the capability of companies to fund their investments whereas the latter create political and institutional instability that lasts for lengthy durations.

Sovereign Rankings: Measures and Course of

    Since few of us have the assets or the time to dedicate to understanding small and unfamiliar nations, it’s no shock that third events have stepped into the breach, with their assessments of sovereign default danger. Of those third-party assessors, bond rankings businesses got here in with the largest benefits:

1. They’ve been assessing default danger in companies for 100 years or extra and presumably can switch a few of their abilities to assessing sovereign danger.
2. Bond traders who’re accustomed to the rankings measures, from investing in company bonds, discover it simple to increase their use to assessing sovereign bonds. Thus, a AAA rated nation is seen as near riskless whereas a C rated nation could be very dangerous. 

Moody’s, Customary and Poor’s and Fitch’s have been score company bond choices because the early a part of the 20th century. Moody’s has been score company bonds since 1919 and began score authorities bonds within the Nineteen Twenties, when that market was an lively one. By 1929, Moody’s supplied rankings for nearly fifty central governments. With the Nice Despair and the Second World Battle, investments in authorities bonds abated and with it, the curiosity in authorities bond rankings. Within the Seventies, the enterprise picked up once more slowly. As just lately because the early Eighties, solely about 13  governments, principally in developed and mature markets, had rankings, with most of them commanding the very best degree (Aaa). The last decade from 1985 to 1994 added 34 nations to the sovereign score listing, with a lot of them having speculative or decrease rankings and by 2024, Moody’s alone was score 143 nations, masking 75% of all rising market nations and nearly each developed market. 

Not solely have rankings businesses develop into extra lively in including nations to their rankings listing, however they’ve additionally expanded their protection of nations with extra default danger/ decrease rankings.  In truth, the variety of Aaa rated nations was the identical in 1985, when there have been 13 rated nations, as in 2025, when there have been 143 rated nations. Within the final 20 years, no less than 5 sovereigns, together with Japan, the UK, France and now the US, have misplaced their Aaa rankings.  Along with extra nations being rated, the rankings themselves have develop into richer. Moody’s and S&P now present two rankings for every nation – a neighborhood forex score (for home forex debt/ bonds) and a international forex score (for presidency borrowings in a international forex). 

    In assessing these sovereign rankings, rankings businesses draw on a mess of information, quantitative and qualitative. Moody’s describes its sovereign rankings course of within the image under:

The method is broad sufficient to cowl each political and financial elements, whereas preserving wiggle room for the rankings businesses to make subjective judgments on default that may result in completely different rankings for 2 nations with comparable financial and political profiles. The warmth map under supplies the sovereign rankings, from Moody’s, for all rated nations the beginning of 2025:

Moody’s sovereign rankings

Notice that the greyed out nations are unrated, with Russia being probably the most important instance; the rankings businesses withdrew their score for Russia in 2022 and never reinstated it but. There have been solely a handful of Aaa rated nations, concentrated in North America (United States and Canada), Northern Europe (Germany, Scandinavia), Australia & New Zealand and Singapore (the one Aaa-rated Asian nation. In 2025, there have been a eight sovereign rankings adjustments, 4 upgrades and 4 downgrades, with the US downgrade from Aaa to Aa1 as the very best profile change

With the US downgrade, the listing of Aaa-rated nations has develop into shorter, and as Canada and Germany wrestle with finances imbalances, the chances are extra corporations will drop off the listing.

Sovereign Rankings:  Efficiency and Alternate options

    If sovereign rankings are designed to measure publicity to default danger, how effectively do they do? The reply depends upon the way you consider their efficiency. The rankings businesses present tables that listing defaults by score that again the proposition that sovereign rankings and default are extremely correlated. A Moody’s replace of default charges by sovereign rankings courses, between 1983 and 2024, yielded the next:

Default charges rise as sovereign rankings decline, with a default price of 24% for  speculative grade sovereign debt (Baa2 and under) versus 1.8% for funding grade (Aaa to Baa1) sovereign debt.

    That stated, there are facets of sovereign rankings that ought to give pause to anybody contemplating utilizing them as their proxy for sovereign default, they do include caveats and limitations:

1. Rankings are upward biased: Rankings businesses have been accused by a few of being far too optimistic of their assessments of each company and sovereign rankings. Whereas the battle of curiosity of getting issuers pay for the score is obtainable because the rationale for the upward bias in company rankings, that argument doesn’t maintain up on the subject of sovereign rankings, since not solely are the revenues small, relative to repute loss, however a proportion of sovereigns are rated for no charges.
2. There may be herd conduct: When one rankings company lowers or raises a sovereign score, different rankings businesses appear to observe go well with. This herd conduct reduces the worth of getting three separate rankings businesses, since their assessments of sovereign danger are now not impartial.
3. Too little, too late: To cost sovereign bonds (or set rates of interest on sovereign loans), traders (banks) want assessments of default danger which can be up to date and well timed. It has lengthy been argued that rankings businesses take too lengthy to vary rankings, and that these adjustments occur too late to guard traders from a disaster.
4. Vicious Cycle: As soon as a market is in disaster, there’s the notion that rankings businesses typically overreact and decrease rankings an excessive amount of, thus making a suggestions impact that makes the disaster worse. That is very true for small nations which can be principally depending on international capital for his or her funds.
5. Regional biases: There are various, particularly in Asia and Latin America, that consider that the rankings businesses are too lax in assessing default danger for North America and Europe,  overrating nations in  these areas, whereas being too stringent of their assessments of default in Asia, Latin America and Africa, underrating nations in these areas. 

In sum, the proof means that whereas sovereign rankings are good measures of nation default danger, adjustments in rankings typically lag adjustments on the bottom, making them much less helpful to lenders and traders.

    If the important thing limitation of sovereign rankings is that they don’t seem to be well timed assessors of nation default danger, that failure is alleviated by the event of the sovereign CDS market, a market the place traders should buy insurance coverage towards nation default danger by paying an (annualized) value. Whereas that market nonetheless has points when it comes to counterparty danger and authorized questions on what includes default, it has expanded within the final 20 years, and initially of 2025, there have been about 80 nations with sovereign CDS out there on them. The warmth map under supplies an image of sovereign (10-year)  CDS spreads on January 1, 2025:

As you possibly can see, even initially of 2025, the market was drawing a distinction between  the most secure Aaa-rated nations (Scandinavia, Switzerland, Australia and New Zealand), all with sovereign CDS spreads of 0.20% or under, and extra dangerous Aaa-rated nations (US, Germany, Canada). Throughout 2025, the market shocks from tariff and commerce wars have had an impact, with sovereign CDS spreads rising, particularly in April. The US, which began 2025 with a sovereign CDS unfold of 0.41%, noticed a widening of the unfold to 0.62% in late April, earlier than dropping again a bit in Could, with the Moody’s downgrade having nearly no impact on the US sovereign CDS unfold.

The US Downgrade: Lead-in and Aftermath

    With that background on sovereign default and rankings, let’s check out the story of the second, which is the Moody’s downgrade of the US from Aaa to Aa1. Within the weeks since, we have now not seen a serious upheaval in markets, and the query that we face as traders and analysts is whether or not something of consequence has modified because of the downgrade.

The Lead-in

    As I famous initially of this put up, Moody’s was the final of the large three sovereign rankings businesses giving america a Aaa score, with S&P (in 2011) and Fitch (in 2023) having already downgraded the US. In truth, the 2 causes that each rankings businesses supplied on the time of their downgrades have been rising authorities debt and politically dysfunction have been additionally the explanations that Moody’s famous of their downgrade. On the debt entrance, one of many measures that rankings businesses use to evaluate a rustic’s monetary standing is its debt to GDP ratio, and it’s plain that this statistic has trended upwards for america:

The ramping up of US debt since 2008 is mirrored in whole federal debt rising from 80% of GDP in 2008  to greater than 120% in 2024. Whereas among the surge in debt could be attributed to the exigencies attributable to crises (the 2008 banking disaster and the 2020 COVID bailouts), the troubling fact is that the debt has outlasted the crises and blaming the crises for the debt ranges immediately is disingenuous. 

    The issue with the debt-to-GDP measure of sovereign fiscal standing is that it’s an imperfect indicator, as could be seen on this listing of nations that scored highest and lowest on this measure in 2023:

Market Response

    The rankings downgrade was after shut of buying and selling on Friday, Could 16, and there was concern about how it might play out in markets, after they opened on Monday, Could 19. US equities have been truly up on that day, although they misplaced floor within the subsequent days:

If fairness markets have been comparatively unscathed within the two weeks after the downgrade, what about bond markets, and specifically, the US treasury market? In any case, an issuer downgrade for any bond is dangerous information, and charges needs to be anticipated to rise to replicate greater default danger:

Whereas charges did go up within the the primary few days after the downgrade, the impact was muddled by the passage of a reconciliation invoice in the home that probably might add to the deficit in future years. In truth, by the Could 29, 2025, nearly all the downgrade impact had pale, with charges near the place they have been initially of the yr.

    You might be stunned that markets didn’t react extra negatively to the rankings downgrade, however I’m not for 3 causes:

Penalties for valuation and funding evaluation

   Whereas the quick financial and monetary penalties of a downgrade from Aaa to Aa1 will probably be small, there are implications for analysts all over the world. Specifically, analysts must take steps when working with US {dollars} that they could already be taking already when working with most different currencies in estimating primary inputs into monetary evaluation.

    Let’s begin with the riskfree price, a primary constructing block for estimating prices of fairness and capital, that are inputs into intrinsic valuation. In precept, the riskfree price is what you’ll earn on a assured funding in a forex, and any danger premiums, both for investing in fairness (fairness danger premium) or in mounted earnings securities (default spreads), are added to the riskfree price. It’s normal observe in lots of textbooks and lecture rooms to make use of the federal government bond price as the chance free price, however that’s constructed on the presumption that governments can’t default (no less than on bonds issued within the native forex). Utilizing a Aaa (AAA) score as a (lazy) proxy for default-free, that’s the rationale we used to justify authorities bond charges as riskfree charges initially of 2025, in Australian, Singapore and Canadian {dollars}, the Euro (Germany). Swiss francs and Danish krone. As we famous within the first part, the idea that governments do not default  is violated in observe, since some nations select to default on native forex bonds, moderately than resist inflation. If that’s the case, the federal government bond price is now not actually a riskfree price, and attending to a riskfree price would require netting out a default unfold from the federal government bond price:

Danger free price = Authorities Bond price − Default unfold for the federal government 

The default unfold could be estimated both from the sovereign bond score (with a glance up desk) or a sovereign CDS unfold, and we used that course of to get riskfree in charges in a  host of currencies, the place native forex authorities bonds had default danger, initially of 2025:

Thus, to get a riskfree price in Indian rupees, Brazilian reals or Turkish lira, we begin with authorities bonds in these currencies and internet out the default spreads for the nations in query. We do that to make sure that we do not double depend nation danger by first utilizing the federal government bond (which incorporates default danger) as a riskfree price after which utilizing a bigger fairness danger premium to permit for a similar nation danger.  

    Now that the US is now not Aaa rated, we have now to observe an analogous course of to get a riskfree price in US {dollars}:

• US 10-year treasury bond price on Could 30, 2025  = 4.41%
• Default unfold primarily based on Aa1 score on Could 30, 2025  = 0.40%
• Riskfree price in US {dollars} on Could 30, 2025 = US 10-year treasury price – Aa1 default unfold = 4.41% – 0.40% = 4.01%

This adjustment yields a riskfree price of 4.01% in US {dollars}, and it’s also constructed on the presumption that the default unfold manifested after the Moody’s downgrade on Could 16, when the extra reasonable studying is that US treasury markets have been carrying a  default unfold embedded in them for years, and that we do not make it specific.

    The rankings downgrade for the US may even have an effect on the fairness danger premium computations that I exploit to estimate the price of fairness for corporations. As a few of you who monitor my fairness danger premiums by nation know, I estimate an fairness danger premium for the S&P 500, and no less than till the beginning of this yr, I used that as a premium for all mature markets (with a AAA (Aaa) score because the indicator of maturity). Thus, nations like Canada, Germany, Australia and Singapore have been all assigned the identical premium as that attributed to the S&P 500. For nations with rankings under Aaa, I added an “additional nation danger premium”  computed primarily based upon the default spreads that went with the nation rankings:

With the rankings downgrade, I must modify this course of in 3 ways. The primary is that when computing the fairness danger premium for the S& P 500, I must internet out the adjusted riskfree price in US {dollars} moderately than the US treasury price, yielding the next fairness danger premium for the US. Second, for Aaa rated nations, to the extent that they’re safer than the US will should be assigned an fairness danger premium decrease than the US, with the adjustment downward reflecting the Aa1 score for the US. The third is that for all different nations, the country danger premium will probably be computed primarily based upon the the their default spreads and the fairness danger premium estimated for Aaa rated nations (moderately than the US fairness danger premium):

How will the price of fairness for a agency with all of its revenues in america be affected as a consequence? Let’s take three corporations, one below-average danger, one average-risk and one above common danger, and compute their prices of fairness on Could 30, 2025, with and with out the downgrade factored in:

As you possibly can see, the anticipated return on the S&P 500 as of Could 30, 2025, reflecting the index degree then and the anticipated money flows, is 8.64%. Incorporating the consequences of the downgrade adjustments the composition of that anticipated return, leading to a decrease riskfree price (4.01% as an alternative of 4.41%) and the next fairness danger premium (4.63% as an alternative of 4.23%). Thus, whereas the anticipated return for the common inventory stays at 8.64%, the anticipated return will increase barely for riskier shares and reduces barely for safer shares, however the results are so small that traders will hardly discover. If there’s a lesson for analysts right here, it’s that the downgrade’s results on the low cost charges (prices of fairness and capital) are minimal, and that staying with the traditional method (of utilizing the ten-year US treasury bond price because the riskfree price and utilizing that price to compute the fairness danger premium) will proceed to work.

Conclusion

    The Moody’s rankings downgrade of the US made the information, and far was fabricated from it through the weekend that adopted. The monetary and financial penalties, no less than to date, have been inconsequential, with fairness and bond markets shrugging off the downgrade, maybe as a result of the shock issue was minimal. The downgrade additionally has had solely a minimal affect on prices of fairness and capital for US corporations, and whereas that will change, the adjustments will come from macroeconomic information or from crises. For probably the most half, analysts ought to have the ability to proceed to work with the US treasury price as a riskfree price and forward-looking fairness danger premiums, as they did earlier than the downgrade. With all of that stated, although, the Moody’s motion does carry symbolic weight, one other indicator that US exceptionalism, which allowed the US to take financial and financial actions that might have introduced blowback for different nations, particularly in rising markets, is coming to an finish. That’s wholesome, in the long run, for each america and the remainder of the world, however it should include brief time period ache.

YouTube Video